Robyn Benson, PSAC

Our campaign must be working



Stop the cuts2.jpg

…because we’re attracting slings and arrows from the other side. They can’t attack the truth of our message about the damage done to Canada by the Harper Conservatives. So instead they’re shooting at the messenger. But not very effectively.

Here, for example, is Lorrie Goldstein of the Toronto Sun:

“Harper’s Conservatives Are Bleeding Our Public Services: Vote to Stop the Cuts” is the theme of the campaign to be featured on “billboards, posters, radio ads and targeted web and social media content.”

Translated from union-speak, this means PSAC is alleging the feds are bleeding the country’s 170,000 federal public servants dry.


There’s lots more along that line. The Sun declined to print my short response, so here it is:

Suddenly the mystery of why Sun Media covers unions so horridly has been solved. Your union speak translation service is completely hopeless.

Somehow your editorialist translated our campaign against shuttering veterans support services, closing search and rescue bases, and cutting employment insurance benefits as being about employee wages.

When we say transport, food safety and environmental regulations are being gutted, you dismiss it as a ‘festival of indignation’. Someone needs to go back to translation school.

You got one thing right though. Our Vote to Stop the Cuts awareness raising campaign encourages people concerned about these issues—people who understand them a bit better than the Sun with its ‘how bad can things be, we’re still breathing’ message—to vote against candidates who’ve done this damage to their country.


Then we have the Sun’s Ryan Doyle:

Perhaps PSAC should speak to those who have spilled real blood for our nation, before making our Maple Leaf a casualty in its imaginary war.


Where has he been? We’ve been speaking to those men and women for some time: veterans, who are directly bearing the cost of Harper’s cutback campaign, have joined with us in protest.

And then there’s Howard Levitt in the National Post:

PSAC does not represent “Canadians.” …The PSAC’s concern is not a reduction in government services but cuts to their members’ jobs and benefits with the concomitant dues paid into the union’s coffers.


Of course we don’t “represent” Canadians—we’ve never claimed the contrary—but we are Canadians, and our members serve Canadians from coast to coast to coast. We know from firsthand experience, as Levitt should know, that cutbacks have resulted in lengthy benefit backlogs for unemployed Canadians, the loss of vital front-line services for veterans, and serious threats to our environment, just to give a few examples.

Can any of this be seriously denied?

Obviously not. So instead, our opponents are trying to shift the debate: from the effects of the cuts, to the people protesting those effects. And expect a lot more of this in the lead-up to the October 19 federal election.

It’s dishonest, in a word.

During our current campaign, we’re inviting those who support and benefit from quality public services to keep these cuts in mind when they vote. We’re proud of the work that our members do, helping to protect the quality of life that Canadians have every right to expect. But that quality of life has been diminished by the Harper government. As we’ve been saying for some time, everyone is affected—PSAC members and the general public, union members in general and non-union workers as well.

In the final analysis, this isn’t about the PSAC. It’s about Canada: the Canada we live in, the country we love. The Canada our children, and their children, will inherit. As citizens, we’re speaking out about that, and we’ll continue to do so. And so should everyone.


comments powered by Disqus

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Robyn Benson, PSAC published on July 27, 2015 8:00 AM.

Harper's child benefit: bribing Canadians with their own money was the previous entry in this blog.

Status of women in Canada--2015 is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed / S'abonner au flux de ce blog


This blogsite is intended to be a safe space for everyone to comment on the issues raised here. Spirited debate is encouraged, in the language of your choice, but profanity, discriminatory words and other forms of abuse are not. Feel free to speak your mind, but please keep it civil and respectful.


Ce blogue a pour objet d’offrir un espace sécuritaire où chacun peut réagir aux questions soulevées. On encourage les débats animés, dans la langue de votre choix, mais non les insultes et les propos discriminatoires. N’hésitez pas à donner votre opinion, mais faites-le de manière civilisée et respectueuse.

Categories

Powered by Movable Type 6.0.8